Add failing tests for newly discovered bug

src/writerecord.test.js

@@ -568,4 +568,87 @@ test("Record digestion is order independent", () => {
     //criss cross records from two other nodes here
 });
 
- */
+ */
+
+describe("records anchored to each other and future timestamp resolves", () => {
+    let prop;
+    let reca;
+    let recb;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        prop = constructActiveProperty("machine1", "bananas");
+
+        //So the hallmark here is that they both are aware of each other... Which shouldn't be possible
+        // and a brief look above I didn't see a case testing it (but it's late and I'm tired so maybe I missed it)
+        // either way this got through and caused an inconsistent sync in Binder so I'm enshrining it.
+
+        reca = createRecord(prop, "delete", null);
+        reca.timestamp = 1;
+        reca.machineId = "a";
+        reca.machineIndex = 1;
+        reca.anchors = {"b": 1};
+
+        recb = createRecord(prop, "write", true);
+        recb.timestamp = 2; //still fails if same...
+        recb.machineId = "b";
+        recb.machineIndex = 1;
+        recb.anchors = {"a": 1};
+    });
+
+
+    test("B before A, and the property is alive", () => {
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, recb);
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, reca);
+
+        expect(readPropertyValue(prop)).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("A before B, and the property is alive", () => {
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, reca);
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, recb);
+
+        expect(readPropertyValue(prop)).toBe(true);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("records anchored to each other, same timestamps", () => {
+    let prop;
+    let reca;
+    let recb;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        prop = constructActiveProperty("machine1", "bananas");
+
+        //So the hallmark here is that they both are aware of each other... Which shouldn't be possible
+        // and a brief look above I didn't see a case testing it (but it's late and I'm tired so maybe I missed it)
+        // either way this got through and caused an inconsistent sync in Binder so I'm enshrining it.
+
+        reca = createRecord(prop, "delete", null);
+        reca.timestamp = 1;
+        reca.machineId = "a";
+        reca.machineIndex = 1;
+        reca.anchors = {"b": 1};
+
+        recb = createRecord(prop, "write", true);
+        recb.timestamp = 1;
+        recb.machineId = "b";
+        recb.machineIndex = 1;
+        recb.anchors = {"a": 1};
+    });
+
+    //Write takes precedence over delete when all else is in conflict.
+
+    test("B before A, and the property is alive", () => {
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, recb);
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, reca);
+
+        expect(readPropertyValue(prop)).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("A before B, and the property is alive", () => {
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, reca);
+        digestRecordIntoProperty(prop, recb);
+
+        expect(readPropertyValue(prop)).toBe(true);
+    });
+});